Showing posts with label Talent. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Talent. Show all posts

Friday, 13 January 2017

Enriching perspectives: gifted children (16/12/16)


Today we've had the pleasure of having a marvelous talk about a topic which (sadly enough) was rather unknown to us: gifted children. The guest speaker was Mª Luz, the secretary of AVAST, the Valencian association for gifted students, parents and teachers, whose main aim is orientating and helping them to get in touch with experts in the field, so all together they can make the most of the educative experience of those children. Indeed, Mª Luz is the proud mother of two of them, the real reason which arose her curiosity and interest in this field.

Based on her personal experience, her talk has dealt with the stereotypes and false myths that have shaped society's vision of those special learners, such as:

-Gifted children mainly referring to little boys with glasses, dressed like adults and surrounded by books and blackboards (a stereotype which we can confirm after a quick search on the Internet to illustrate the post) 




-Gifted as synonym of over-stimulated children whose parents 'forced' them to learn too fast for their age.

- Gifted in the sense of 'antisocial nerds'

However, she has showed us that in general those scornful stereotypes have nothing to do with the real lives of these special students -for instance, the activity she proposed about identifying gifted teenagers only basing our guesses on their physical appearance demonstrated how wrong we were. What really shocked us was the fact that many of these talented individuals have actually failed at academic levels, whereas they were outstanding in the artistic fields. The frustration they felt inside a school system which limits their cognitive capacities really touched us. Neither did we see as students the purpose of repeating the same kind of exercise one hundred times once we had already learnt to do it. Thus, now as teachers we understand the innate curiosity of these children and their desire of always learning more. Instead of cutting their wings, as educators it is our duty to make available for them all the materials and resources which can better equip their eager minds. After all, curiosity is one of the most powerful tools to change and improve the world!




On the other hand, the idea that also caught our attention was the legal situation of these children and their families, and the lack of resources available for them. As the case of Ena demonstrates, families encounter a lot of red tape and social opposition when trying to find the most suitable educative experience for their children. In general, we tend to pay more attention to the people at the left side of the Gauss curve (people with a lower IC), completely forgetting the ones at the right side. Our point is that the principle of 'catering for diversity' means taking into account all the different types of special needs when designing the syllabus -as it is the core idea of the inclusive school. We believe that it is possible to adapt the educational standards to the particular needs of each student. Thus, we agree with Mª Luz' statement that a system in which all learners, regardless of their innate capacities, are 'forced' to learn the same content with the same level of difficulty has no sense, since ones could get bored while others would feel confused and lost. The ideal model would be an equitable system in which the content is adapted to each student, so every single individual is guaranteed the right of learning something new and enriching every day, something able to stimulate them at all levels.



In conclusion, this talk has completely changed our vision of talented children. We are no longer afraid of having one of them in class, because now we understand this challenge as a unique opportunity of learning more and growing ourselves both as teachers and individuals. 
We hope to be able to identify these special students in the future and to construct together a successful learning experience for everyone!

Friday, 23 December 2016

Group presentations (2/12/16)



Today we have dedicated our whole lesson to the group presentations about the collaborative project that all of us have done. As it has been reflected on previous entries, this group focused its presentation on the Swiss linguist Saussure. 

All of us were sitting in circle in the middle of the classroom, so the atmosphere of the class was more relaxed and not that formal. We were the first ones to present, but it was not a problem for us because we were perfectly ready for it. The most difficult thing was adapting all the information that we had to the 5 minutes that the presentation should last. We tried to summarize all the content to the timing without leaving anything important out. 

And finally, we did it!!! 


Then, the rest of our peers expose their projects as well. Each group had to assess two groups’ presentation so that we could evaluate reciprocally. We all did it very good and the results can be seen in the assessment sheets. Maybe there were some mistakes of content, timing or organization, but we are very sure that in the next projects they would disappear and the presentations will be better. 

In general, all the presentations were very interesting and we all were very concentrated on the content in order to learn many things about linguists like Chomsky, Piaget and Vygotsky. We hope that our peers would have learnt about our beloved linguist, Saussure.

Sunday, 18 December 2016

COLLABORATIVE PROJECT



LET’S COLLABORATE!

Today we are presenting our first collaborative project!!! We had never done any collaborative task like this one and we were a bit confused at the beginning. We all prepared very long projects which would take half a lesson to be explained… Yet, once we understood what it was about, we went straight down to work! Basically, the class was divided among groups of five people and each group had to make a very short presentation about a linguist. We got to choose, and for us, Saussure was THE ONE. This way, the whole lesson was taught by us, the students, who learnt from all the other groups.

THE MAKING OF...

Here are two of us, trying to get Genially to work… Yes, we did not want to use power point, since we thought we might engage our peers’ attention better with this new tool. It took a while, but the results were worth it!

We got to revise our previous knowledge about Saussure’s dualism. We talked about language being structural, and thus a system of signs which were composed by a signifier and a signified. We reflected upon the properties of such signs: arbitrariness, linearity and value. We discussed the difference between “langue” and “parole”. And we learnt about his influence on several other linguists and artists! We loved the famous picture… “Ceci n’est pas une pipe” So we decided to wink at Saussure, the linguist who united our group, and name our blog: “This is not a blog”.



Ferdinand de Saussure and Structural Linguistics

This is us just before the presentation!




WE LEARNT…

After doing this project, we actually understood the importance that collaborative teaching and learning entailed. The lesson was completely student-centered. All students had an active role: they were either presenters or evaluators of their classmates’ work. We all learnt from each other since we all shared similar funds of knowledge which allowed us to explain the key contents in a way that we knew the rest would understand.

We have decided to do some research and we have learnt a bit more about collaborative learning:

It bases on the fact that knowledge is a social construct and thus it should be approached from a social point of view. This is why learners are encouraged to work both peer-to-peer, which involves students working in pairs to solve problems, and group-to-group, which can be activities done in one class or projects that may take a week, a month, or even a whole semester.

Every day after class, students will enter a society where they will have to interact and cooperate with many different people from many different backgrounds. Thus, collaborative learning is essential not only in terms of teaching a given subject, but also in terms of teaching about life, society and culture. Moreover, they learn and are encouraged to develop schemata for real-life problems’ solving.